In a major policy move, the Enugu State Government has reduced land-related rates by 60% and banned all forms of illegal levies, aiming to ease the cost of property ownership and attract investors.

The announcement was made during a stakeholders’ town hall on land development at the International Conference Centre, Enugu, on Thursday. Governor Peter Mbah was represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Chidiebere Onyia.

Unified Land Use Charge Introduced

The reform introduces a Unified Land Use Charge, combining ground rent, land use fees, and property taxes into a single annual payment. This system:

Requires one payment per year through the Enugu State Internal Revenue Service (EIRS).

Applies to all properties, including both government estates and private layouts.

Is digitized through the Enugu State Geographic Information System (ENGIS), reducing hidden charges and eliminating double payments.

The streamlined system is expected to significantly lower the cost of land acquisition and ownership, benefiting both residents and real estate developers.

Crackdown on “Ogbonecheagu” Fees

A major part of the reforms is the ban on illegal “Ogbonecheagu” levies, previously collected by some local agents and communities. Governor Mbah declared these charges illegal and instructed their immediate abolition.

To enforce compliance, the government has:

Set up a Task Force to monitor sites and prevent illegal levies.

Established a whistleblowing channel (Whistleblowing@enugustate.gov.ng) for residents to report extortion attempts.

Urban Expansion and Improved Tenure Security

The state has also designated nine additional local government areas as urban areas, enabling structured planning, infrastructure development, and faster issuance of Certificates of Occupancy (C of O).

ENGIS Managing Director Chiwetalu Nwatu highlighted that full digitization of land records now allows every plot in the state to be tracked, with C of O applications processed within 48 to 72 hours, improving the ease of doing business in Enugu.

By cutting land rates and eliminating informal levies, the Mbah administration aims to unlock the economic potential of land, stimulate real estate investment, and remove longstanding barriers to urban development. Stakeholders, including traditional rulers and developers, have welcomed the reforms, describing them as a bold step toward making Enugu a hub for sustainable property investment.

The post Enugu Slashes Land Rates by 60%, Bans Illegal Levies to Boost Property Sector appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

By: Housing Development Advocacy Network (HDAN)

Housing policy reflects how seriously a government treats the welfare of its people. A comparison between the United Kingdom and Nigeria shows two very different approaches—one built around strong public responsibility and regulation, the other largely left to market forces with limited protection for citizens.

1. Role of Government

United Kingdom

Housing is clearly recognised as a social responsibility of government. The UK government actively:

• Funds social and affordable housing
• Regulates rent increases
• Supports housing associations and councils
• Intervenes directly when affordability is threatened

Recent examples include £2.5bn low-interest loans at 0.1% for registered providers and long-term rent-setting frameworks to give certainty to both tenants and developers.

Nigeria

Nigeria’s housing policy largely treats housing as a private sector–driven activity. Government involvement is mostly limited to:

Policy declarations

Land administration

Occasional public housing projects

Direct government investment in rental housing is minimal, leaving affordability largely at the mercy of the market.

2. Housing Finance & Funding

• United Kingdom
• Government-backed grants and ultra-low interest loans
• Strong housing associations sector
• Long-term funding programmes (10–30 years)

Cheap borrowing allows providers to build and maintain homes without pushing rents sharply upward.

Nigeria

Housing finance is expensive and short-term

Mortgage interest rates often exceed 20%

Limited access to long-tenure loans

Developers transfer high financing costs directly to buyers and tenants through higher prices and rents.

3. Rent Regulation & Tenant Protection

United Kingdom

Rent increases are regulated, especially in social housing

Clear tenancy laws protect tenants from sudden eviction

Rent convergence policies are gradual and transparent

Advance rent demands are strictly controlled

Nigeria

Rent control laws exist in theory but are weakly enforced

Landlords often demand 1–2 years’ rent in advance

Sudden rent hikes of 30–70% are common

Tenants have limited access to fast dispute resolution

4. Housing Supply Strategy

United Kingdom

Focus on rental housing, not just homeownership

Strong emphasis on social and affordable homes

Planning policies encourage inclusionary housing

Local councils actively plan for population growth

Nigeria

Heavy focus on homeownership, even though most citizens are renters

Public housing supply is far below demand

Urban migration outpaces housing delivery

Planning often reacts after problems emerge

5. Regulation of Developers

United Kingdom

• Developers and housing providers must be registered
• Strong oversight by housing regulators
• Strict penalties for non-compliance
• Consumer protection is Central

Nigeria

The real estate sector remains largely unregulated

Anyone can operate as a developer

High incidence of fraud, double allocations, and abandoned projects

Weak consumer protection mechanism

6. Impact on Citizens

United Kingdom

Rent still rising, but within regulated frameworks

Housing stress exists, but safety nets are stronger

Government intervention cushions vulnerable households

Nigeria

• Rent consumes 40–60% of household income in major cities
• Rising homelessness and overcrowding
• Workers pushed to distant satellite towns
• Housing crisis spilling into transport, health, and security challenges

Key Differences at a Glance

Area United Kingdom Nigeria

• Government role Strong, direct Weak, indirect
• Housing funding Cheap, long-term Expensive, short-term
• Rent regulation Enforced Poorly enforced
• Rental housing focus High Low
• Developer regulation Strict Weak
• Tenant protection Strong Limited

Lessons Nigeria Can Learn from the UK

1. Treat housing as social infrastructure, not a luxury

2. Invest public funds in rental housing, not just ownership

3. Provide low-interest financing for housing delivery

4. Enforce tenancy laws to protect citizens

5. Regulate the real estate sector to eliminate fraud

6. Plan housing alongside urban migration and transport

Conclusion

While the UK still faces housing challenges, its policies show a clear understanding that housing stability underpins economic stability. Nigeria’s current approach—largely market-led with minimal safeguards—has resulted in soaring rents, housing insecurity, and social strain.

For Nigeria to reverse its housing crisis, it must move closer to the UK model: strong government leadership, sustainable financing, strict regulation, and a clear commitment to housing as a social responsibility.

—

If you want this typeset for newspaper pages, converted to PDF, or adapted to magazine column format, say the word.

The post A Comparison of Housing Policies in the UK and Nigeria appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

The Honourable Minister of Housing and Urban Development, Arc. Ahmed Musa Dangiwa, has urged state governments, housing institutions, development finance institutions (DFIs), and other key stakeholders to actively participate in the National Homeownership and Housing Development Campaign. The initiative aims to provide a coordinated approach to housing delivery at the state level.

Arc. Dangiwa made the appeal while delivering a thematic address at the 14th meeting of the National Council on Lands, Housing and Urban Development in Ilorin, Kwara State. The campaign is set to launch in Katsina State on 4–5 March 2026 for the North-West geopolitical zone.

“The Campaign represents our determination to lead a unified approach to housing development, ensuring federal programmes, reforms, and private capital translate into visible, deliverable projects at the state level,” Dangiwa said.

Organised by the Know This Nigeria Network (KTNN) in collaboration with the Federal Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, the campaign includes Regional Executive Sessions and Public Homeownership Seminars to strengthen links between federal housing institutions, DFIs, and state governments.

Dangiwa highlighted that the initiative aligns with the Ministry’s Unified Housing Delivery Framework, designed to ensure federal and state governments work together as “One Coherent National Housing Delivery System” for sustainable homeownership and urban development.

QS Muhammed Baba Adamu, National Coordinator of the campaign, emphasized that the initiative will enable states to attract and deploy housing capital effectively and encouraged the establishment of State Housing Reform Offices (SHROs) to provide technical and advisory support for bankable housing projects.

The 14th National Council meeting, themed “Achieving Housing Delivery and Sustainable Cities through Effective Land Management, Urban Renewal, Promotion of Local Building Materials, and Public-Private Partnerships in Nigeria,” brought together governors, lawmakers, commissioners, housing agencies, developers, and stakeholders from all 36 states and the FCT.

The campaign marks a major step toward coordinated housing delivery and sustainable urban development across Nigeria.

The post Housing Minister Calls on States, Stakeholders to Back National Homeownership Campaign appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

The Transmission Company of Nigeria has announced a planned maintenance exercise that will result in a temporary power outage across parts of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.

In a statement issued on Saturday, TCN said the maintenance would be carried out at the Apo 132/33kV Transmission Substation. The exercise is scheduled to take place on Saturday, January 24, 2026, between 9:00 am and 4:00 pm.

According to the company, the planned work will involve maintenance on the 60MVA 132/33kV transformer (3APH TR1) and its associated switchgear at the facility.

TCN explained that during the maintenance period, the Abuja Electricity Distribution Company will be unable to receive bulk power supply for onward distribution to customers in several areas. The affected locations include Gudu District, Gaduwa, Durumi, the Printing and Minting axis, Garki, and surrounding communities.

The company assured electricity consumers that power supply would be restored immediately after the completion of the maintenance work.

TCN also apologised for the inconvenience the outage may cause residents and businesses in the affected areas, urging consumers to make adequate arrangements ahead of the scheduled disruption.

The post TCN Schedules Maintenance, Parts of Abuja to Experience Power Outage appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

By Oyetunde M. Ajayi

Housing is universally acknowledged as a basic human need, yet in Nigeria, it has increasingly become a luxury beyond the reach of the majority.

Across cities and towns, from Lagos and Abuja to Port Harcourt, Abeokuta, Ibadan and Onitsha, the signs of a deepening housing crisis are unmistakable: soaring rents, overcrowded dwellings, the expansion of informal settlements, and a growing population of urban poor struggling to secure decent shelter.

While many factors contribute to this crisis, rapid urbanisation, population growth, rising construction costs, and weak mortgage systems, one policy framework stands out for urgent reconsideration: The Land Use Act of 1978. The Land Use Act was promulgated with laudable objectives. It sought to unify land tenure systems, curb land speculation, make land accessible for development, and ensure equitable distribution of land for all Nigerians.

By vesting land in each state in the hands of the Governor, to be held in trust for the people, the Act aimed to simplify land administration and promote orderly development. Nearly five decades later, however, the realities on ground suggest that the Act has fallen short of these intentions and, in many respects, has become a structural bottleneck in housing delivery.

One of the most critical challenges posed by the Land Use Act is the over-centralisation of land control. By concentrating decision-making power in the offices of state governors, access to land has become highly bureaucratic, slow, and often politicised. Ordinary Nigerians seeking land for housing must navigate a maze of approvals, consent requirements, and administrative delays. The process of obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy (C of O), which is essential for secure tenure and access to mortgage finance, is notoriously cumbersome, expensive, and time-consuming. In some states, it can take years, discouraging formal housing development and pushing many citizens toward informal land markets.

This bureaucratic rigidity has direct implications for housing affordability. When access to land is constrained, land prices rise. Developers transfer these costs to homebuyers and tenants, resulting in exorbitant house prices and rents. For low- and middle-income earners, the majority of Nigeria’s urban population, formal housing becomes unattainable.

Consequently, informal settlements proliferate, often without basic services, proper planning, or security of tenure, further deepening urban inequality and environmental vulnerability.

The Land Use Act has also weakened the functioning of land as collateral for housing finance. Because land rights are not fully alienable without gubernatorial consent, financial institutions are often reluctant to accept land titles as reliable security. This undermines mortgage development and limits long-term housing finance.

In a country where housing delivery requires massive private sector participation, a legal framework that discourages investment and increases risk is counterproductive. Moreover, the Act has failed to adequately recognise Nigeria’s socio-cultural diversity in land tenure systems. Customary landholding arrangements, particularly in rural and peri-urban areas, continue to operate alongside statutory systems, creating legal ambiguities and frequent conflicts. Rather than harmonising these systems effectively, the Act has often widened the gap between formal law and lived realities, leaving many Nigerians with insecure and undocumented land rights.

Given the scale of today’s housing crisis, a fundamental rethink of the Land Use Act is no longer optional, it is imperative. This does not necessarily mean discarding the Act in its entirety, but rather undertaking comprehensive reforms that align land administration with contemporary housing and urban development needs.

First, there is an urgent need to decentralise and streamline land administration processes. Greater roles should be assigned to local governments and professional land agencies, with clear timelines, transparency, and digital systems to reduce delays and corruption. Second, the consent provisions should be reviewed to make land transactions simpler, faster, and less costly, while still safeguarding public interest.

Third, land titling and registration processes must be made affordable and accessible, especially for low-income households, to enhance tenure security and unlock housing finance. Importantly, land reform must be integrated into a broader national housing strategy that links land access with infrastructure provision, mortgage finance, and inclusive urban planning. Without such integration, reforms will yield limited results.

In conclusion, Nigeria’s housing crisis is not merely a consequence of market forces or population growth; it is deeply rooted in institutional and legal frameworks that shape access to land. The Land Use Act, though well-intentioned, has become misaligned with present-day realities.

As Nigeria confronts rapid urbanisation and an ever-growing housing deficit, the time has come for bold, people-centred land reforms. Rethinking the Land Use Act is not just a legal exercise, it is a crucial step toward making decent, affordable housing a reality for millions of Nigerians.

The post Land Use Act and today’s housing crisis: Time for rethink appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

By Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi SAN, FCIArb. (U.K)

Property ownership in Nigeria is more than an economic asset; it is a symbol of wealth, identity, and social status. As families expand and investments diversify, joint ownership—where two or more parties share rights and interests in the same property—has become increasingly common. Understanding its legal framework is crucial for investors, families, and businesses alike.

Joint ownership in Nigeria typically arises through agreements between parties, inheritance, or operation of law, such as matrimonial or customary family land.

The most common forms of co-ownership include joint tenancy, tenancy in common, and family property. Joint tenancy allows co-owners to hold property under a single title with equal interest and possession, often featuring the right of survivorship, meaning a deceased owner’s share automatically passes to surviving owners.

Tenancy in common, by contrast, gives each co-owner distinct but undivided shares, allowing inheritance through the deceased’s estate or will. Family property, rooted in customary law, is held collectively by a family unit and managed by the family head for the benefit of all members. Legal precedents, including Ekpendu v. Erika, affirm that individual family members cannot dispose of family land without consent from principal members.

The legal framework for joint ownership in Nigeria blends statutory, customary, and common law principles.

The Land Use Act 1978 vests land in state governors, held in trust for the people, while statutory and customary rights of occupancy can be jointly held. Additional legislation, including the Property and Conveyancing Law and Conveyancing Act 1881, provides further structure for creating, transferring, and managing joint ownership interests. Nigerian courts also play a critical role in clarifying ownership distinctions, relying on the intention of the parties, conveyance documents, and the surrounding circumstances, as seen in Adeniran v. Alao.

Jointly owned property carries specific legal implications. Co-owners cannot sell or transfer property without the consent of all parties, and unauthorized sales may be void. Inheritance issues differ depending on the form of ownership; while joint tenancy bypasses traditional inheritance laws, tenancy in common allows a deceased owner’s share to be inherited.

Customary family lands require the consent of principal family members before any sale or alienation. Partitioning or voluntary severance may be pursued when co-owners wish to divide or sell property, guided by the Partition Acts 1882 and 1893.

Joint ownership can also lead to disputes over management, income sharing, maintenance, or unauthorized sales. Experts advise clear documentation, proper registration, and written agreements detailing responsibilities and dispute resolution mechanisms to mitigate these risks. Engaging qualified legal counsel is essential to safeguard interests and ensure compliance with Nigerian property laws.

While joint ownership facilitates collective investment and succession planning, it comes with legal complexities that require careful consideration. Understanding the distinctions between joint tenancy, tenancy in common, and family property is critical to preventing conflicts and ensuring enforceable transactions under Nigerian law.

The post Joint Ownership and Legal Implications in Nigerian Property Transactions appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

The Federal Government and the Niger State Government have entered into a strategic partnership aimed at delivering large-scale housing developments integrated with agriculture and energy infrastructure, as part of broader efforts to address Nigeria’s housing deficit, rural instability and inclusive economic growth.

The agreement, formalised through a Memorandum of Understanding between the Niger State Government and the Ministry of Finance Incorporated, positions housing delivery as the anchor of a wider rural development framework aligned with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda.

Under the arrangement, Niger State will provide 100,000 hectares of land for a pilot phase that combines affordable residential housing with organised farming communities, basic infrastructure and renewable energy solutions. Officials say the model is designed to move beyond isolated housing estates by creating complete, liveable settlements that support productivity and long-term economic activity.

Governor Mohammed Umaru Bago said the initiative reflects a deliberate shift toward housing-centred development, particularly for rural and agrarian populations who have historically lacked access to secure and dignified accommodation.

“This programme recognises that housing is foundational,” Bago said. “When people have safe, permanent homes close to their livelihoods, everything else—security, productivity, health and education—improves.”

He explained that the settlements will allow farmers and rural workers to live within structured communities rather than temporary or dispersed housing, reducing exposure to insecurity and eliminating the need for long daily commutes to farmlands. According to him, the approach also helps curb rural–urban migration by making countryside living more viable and attractive.

The governor noted that Niger State’s land mass, water resources and mechanisation capacity provide a strong base for delivering housing at scale, adding that the project will be driven largely by private capital through an asset-backed financing structure.

“We are not waiting for annual budgets to build houses,” Bago said. “Land is our contribution, private capital will drive construction, and government will ensure speed, clarity of titles and enabling infrastructure.”

Minister of State for Finance, Dr Doris Uzoka-Anite, said the MoU reflects growing recognition at the federal level that Nigeria’s housing challenge cannot be separated from broader economic and social policy goals.

“Housing is not just about shelter,” she said. “It affects productivity, food systems, employment and social stability. When housing is planned alongside infrastructure and livelihoods, it delivers far greater impact.”

Uzoka-Anite explained that the Ministry of Finance Incorporated is central to structuring the initiative in a way that attracts private investors while safeguarding public assets. She said the financing framework blends public land with private funding to lower risk, ensure transparency and deliver housing that remains affordable for low- and middle-income earners.

She added that renewable energy solutions, particularly solar power, will be integrated into the housing developments to reduce household energy costs and support small-scale processing and storage activities within the communities.

Managing Director of the Ministry of Finance Incorporated, Dr Armstrong Takang, said the project reflects a shift away from fragmented housing schemes toward integrated settlement planning that links homes, infrastructure and economic activity.

“You cannot solve the housing deficit by building houses in isolation,” Takang said. “People need power, water, roads, schools and access to markets. This programme is about building complete communities that can sustain themselves.”

He said housing units will be delivered using cost-effective and alternative building technologies to keep prices within reach of rural residents and agricultural workers, while maintaining quality and durability. According to him, construction activity alone is expected to generate significant employment across building materials, logistics and local labour.

Takang added that each housing cluster will be supported by organised land use planning, healthcare facilities, schools and access roads, ensuring that residents are not cut off from essential services.

Beyond shelter, officials said the housing-led model is expected to stimulate job creation across construction, farming, agro-processing and energy services, while strengthening local economies and reducing pressure on urban centres.

As implementation begins, the federal and state governments said the project could serve as a blueprint for other states seeking to tackle housing shortages while driving rural development through private-sector participation.

“This is about delivering housing that supports livelihoods and dignity,” Bago said. “Not isolated estates, but communities where people can live, work and thrive.”

The post FG, Niger State Partner on Large-Scale Housing-Led Rural Development appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

Dangote Cement Plc has received commendation from the Federal Government for the successful delivery of multi-million-naira social intervention projects in its Gboko host communities in Benue State.

The recognition was made during the formal inauguration of these projects on January 8, 2026, by the Minister of Solid Minerals Development, Dr. Dele Alake.

According to the Minister, Dangote Cement has demonstrated exemplary compliance with its statutory obligations under the Community Development Agreement (CDA) framework, a legal mechanism designed to ensure that mining companies reinvest a portion of their profits into host communities.

The interventions, which include water infrastructure, expanded scholarship schemes, and vocational skills programmes, are part of a broader federal policy aimed at promoting sustainable economic development in Nigeria’s mineral-rich regions.

CDA Compliance and Infrastructure Delivery

The recently completed projects represent the culmination of a five-year Community Development Agreement between Dangote Cement, the Federal Ministry of Solid Minerals Development, and six host communities, including Mbayion, Mbatur, and Pass Brothers.

A significant focus of the 2025/2026 cycle was addressing the region’s chronic potable water shortage.

Dr. Johnson Kor, Head of Social Performance at the Dangote Cement Gboko Plant, disclosed that the newly commissioned water infrastructure includes both motorized and solar-powered boreholes strategically installed across the Pass Brother, Mbaakpoghol-Mbatyu, Mbaswa-Mbatser, and Agboghol-Amua communities.

These areas have historically faced water access challenges despite their proximity to the River Benue. Additionally, the company is implementing electricity projects aimed at integrating these rural communities into the state power grid, providing reliable energy access and supporting local economic activities.

Human Capital Development and Economic Empowerment

Beyond infrastructure, Dangote Cement has intensified investments in human capital. The company increased its scholarship fund to ₦28,800,000 for the 2025/2026 academic session—a threefold increase compared to previous allocations—ensuring equitable access across all six host communities.

Under the supervision of the Industrial Training Fund (ITF), Dangote Cement also graduated a new cohort of participants from its Youth Skill Development Programme. Graduates received certification and starter kits to immediately apply their vocational skills, promoting self-reliance and local economic engagement.

Other social initiatives currently underway include:

• Women Empowerment Programme: Supporting 150 women with skills training and startup resources.
• Farmers Empowerment Programme: Enhancing agricultural productivity for 50 local farmers.
• Youth Empowerment Programme: Focused vocational training for 30 young people, preparing them for income-generating activities.

Regulatory Context and Sectoral Impact

The commendation coincides with the Federal Government’s efforts to standardize social reinvestment in the mining sector. In December 2025, the Ministry of Solid Minerals Development mandated that all licensed mining and quarrying firms finalize their CDAs or face license revocation.

While over 2,400 mineral titles have been issued since 2023, a significant number of companies had not completed formal agreements by late 2025.

By achieving full compliance and delivering tangible community projects, Dangote Cement sets a benchmark for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards in Nigeria’s solid minerals sector.

The government has also called on host communities to take ownership of these initiatives, ensuring their sustainability and impact. Such partnerships are viewed as critical in mitigating the so-called “resource curse” while promoting peaceful coexistence in mining regions.

The post Dangote Cement Wins FG Commendation for Successful Delivery of Social Projects in Benue State appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Air Peace, Allen Onyema, has warned that Nigeria’s domestic aviation sector is facing a severe threat following the introduction of new tax measures that could push airfares to as high as ₦1.7 million and force airlines out of operation.

Speaking during a media interaction on Sunday, Onyema said the cumulative impact of multiple taxes, statutory levies and high borrowing costs could cripple airline operators within months if urgent corrective steps are not taken by the government.

According to him, Nigerian airlines are unfairly perceived as profiteers, despite retaining only a fraction of ticket revenue after mandatory deductions. He explained that from a ticket priced at about ₦350,000, airlines receive as little as ₦81,000, with the remainder consumed by taxes and charges imposed by various agencies.

“Airlines are heavily overburdened by taxes and levies. People think we are making excessive profits, but that is far from the truth,” Onyema said, stressing that excessive deductions continue to weaken the sector.

He cited a mandatory five per cent charge imposed by the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) on every ticket sold, noting that it is only one of several overlapping levies confronting operators.

Onyema argued that the current tax structure contradicts global aviation standards as outlined by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), which discourages governments from using aviation as a revenue-generating tool. Instead, ICAO recommends a cost-recovery model based on services rendered.

“Aviation is not supposed to be a revenue source for government. Charges should reflect the cost of services provided, not be designed to generate profit,” he said, adding that failure to follow this principle has stalled the growth of Nigeria’s airline industry.

The Air Peace boss recalled that the 2020 Finance Act provided significant relief to the aviation sector by exempting aircraft, spare parts, engines and ticket fares from Value Added Tax (VAT) and customs duties. However, he said recent tax changes have reversed those gains.

Under the new tax regime, aircraft and spare parts importation now attract 7.5 per cent VAT, a development Onyema said would sharply increase operating costs for airlines already struggling with foreign exchange challenges and high interest rates.

“If you import an aircraft worth $80 million, you are now required to pay 7.5 per cent VAT. Combine that with bank interest rates of between 30 and 35 per cent, and airline operations become unsustainable,” he said.

He warned that airlines would have no option but to pass the rising costs to passengers, leading to unprecedented increases in domestic airfares.

“With the new tax regime, economy class tickets could rise to about ₦1.7 million. If this policy is fully implemented, Nigerian airlines may not survive beyond three months,” Onyema cautioned.

He disclosed that members of the Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON) had repeatedly engaged relevant government authorities, including the National Assembly and the tax reform committee, to present their concerns.

According to him, lawmakers and government consultants acknowledged the risks after reviewing data presented by airline operators, with some expressing concern over the potential consequences for the sector and the wider economy.

Describing aviation as a critical driver of economic growth, trade and national integration, Onyema urged the Federal Government to reconsider the policy and revert to the provisions of the 2020 aviation tax framework.

He expressed confidence that the current administration, led by President Bola Tinubu, would recognize the strategic importance of the industry and take steps to prevent the collapse of indigenous airlines.

“Across the world, aviation is supported by governments because of its unique nature. We are not asking for handouts, only policies that allow the industry to survive and grow,” he said.

The post Air Peace CEO Warns New Tax Regime Could Trigger Sharp Fare Hikes, Industry Collapse appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

Bilaad Realty, a trailblazer in sustainable real estate development, has been recognized with the Innovation Award at the Africa Housing Awards 2025.

This prestigious honor celebrates Bilaad Realty’s outstanding contributions to the Nigerian real estate sector and its unwavering commitment to delivering cutting-edge, eco-friendly, and community-focused housing solutions.

Headquartered in Abuja, Bilaad Realty is renowned for creating high-quality, integrated communities that prioritize sustainability, security, and modern living.

The company’s mission is to ensure clients receive unmatched service experiences in property ownership, marked by meticulous attention to detail, quality, and guaranteed long-term value. Its vision is to be a market leader with a global reach, forming meaningful partnerships and setting new standards in sustainable real estate.

Bilaad Realty’s developments stand out for their focus on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), with a particular emphasis on clean energy, efficient water use, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The company integrates green technologies, solar and gas solutions, and innovative design features such as fiber-optic connectivity, centralized gas networks, smart home systems, alternative power options, and ample recreational spaces.

This holistic approach ensures modern, comfortable, and secure lifestyles for residents.

Notable projects include The Bahamas (Maitama II, Abuja), Bali Island (Life Camp/Kafe District, Abuja), The Amazon, Bobowasi Island, Capri Island, Mauritius, Seychelles, and Zanzibar—each thoughtfully designed to promote sustainability and community well-being.

Under the strategic leadership of CEO Dr. Emmanuel Bassi Usman and Board Chairman Dr. Sadiq Suleiman Abdullahi, Bilaad Realty has earned the trust of clients and partners who value purpose, quality, and future-focused living.

The company’s passionate team of professionals is dedicated to transforming dream properties into sustainable realities, providing full facility management so residents can focus on living well.

Bilaad Realty’s approach is deeply rooted in values that shape Nigeria’s future. By embracing new technologies and constantly refining their processes, they lead the way in building smarter, greener, and more resilient communities.

The Innovation Award at the Africa Housing Awards 2025 affirms Bilaad Realty’s role as a visionary leader, setting industry benchmarks and inspiring progress toward a more sustainable and prosperous West Africa.

The post Bilaad Realty Wins Innovation Award at Africa Housing Awards 2025 appeared first on Housing TV Africa.