Violent clashes broke out in Madrid on Wednesday as riot police confronted protesters attempting to prevent the eviction of an 87-year-old disabled woman from her long-term home in the city’s Retiro district.

Hundreds of people had gathered outside the apartment, with some spending the night at the scene ahead of the scheduled eviction. Housing activists from tenants’ unions in Madrid and Barcelona joined the demonstration, alongside several public figures.

Despite the protest, a judicial committee eventually carried out the eviction.

Spanish media reported that police used tear gas and made repeated charges against demonstrators as officers attempted to clear access to the building for the judicial officials. Europa Press also reported that emergency medical workers later removed Maricarmen from the building on a stretcher. 

Fourth Attempt Ends In Eviction

The eviction was the fourth attempt to remove Maricarmen from the apartment where she had lived for around 70 years.

The woman, identified in reports as María del Carmen Abascal and commonly known as Maricarmen, had faced a prolonged legal dispute over her tenancy.

The scheduled September 23 eviction followed earlier postponements. A Madrid court had previously delayed the eviction until September after her legal team challenged the proceedings. 

On Wednesday, the judicial commission finally executed the order.

Footage and reports from the scene showed protesters attempting to block access to the building. Police removed activists from the entrance while officers maintained a security cordon around the property. 

Maricarmen was eventually taken from the building on a stretcher and transferred to an ambulance.

Europa Press reported that emergency medical personnel from Samur assisted her as supporters gathered outside and shouted messages of support. 

Rent Increased Above Her Pension

The dispute has attracted significant attention because of Maricarmen’s age, disability and financial circumstances.

According to reports, she had lived in the apartment for decades before the building changed ownership.

The Guardian reported that when a developer acquired the building, Maricarmen was offered the opportunity to purchase her apartment for €247,000, a figure described as unaffordable for her as a pensioner.

Her rent was subsequently increased from €500 to €1,650 a month, while she received a state pension of approximately €1,350.

A prominent writer reportedly offered to cover the difference between her pension and rent indefinitely, but the offer did not resolve the dispute. 

The case became a focus for Madrid’s tenants’ movement, with activists arguing that the circumstances highlighted wider concerns over housing affordability and security of tenure.

Long-Running Tenancy Dispute

The legal dispute centres on the history of the apartment’s tenancy.

According to the reports, the original rental contract was signed in 1956 in the name of Maricarmen’s father.

After his death, the tenancy passed to his wife. Following her death in 2008, the apartment was sublet to Maricarmen.

The property owner, Urbagestión SL, successfully argued before Spain’s Supreme Court that the subletting arrangement was invalid and that the tenancy contract was no longer legally effective.

The company has been approached for comment in reporting on the case. 

Spanish reports said the dispute continued through several stages of litigation before the eviction order was ultimately enforced.

Protesters Demand Housing Protection

The eviction drew support from tenants’ unions and housing campaigners, who organised demonstrations before and during the final eviction attempt.

Around 500 people were reported to have gathered outside Maricarmen’s home ahead of the eviction, according to Spanish public broadcaster RTVE. Several artists and public figures also attended the demonstration. 

Activists used the slogan “Maricarmen se queda”, meaning “Maricarmen stays”, during the campaign.

Protesters also criticised Madrid regional authorities over housing policy, with demonstrators chanting slogans referencing regional president Isabel Díaz Ayuso and an unrelated controversy over a residential property.

Inside the building, some demonstrators occupied the staircase leading towards Maricarmen’s apartment in an attempt to delay access by the judicial committee.

Neighbours reportedly supported the protesters by providing food and access to bathrooms.

Lawyer Says Owner Rejected Offers

Maricarmen’s lawyer, Beatriz Duro, said efforts had been made to find a negotiated solution.

According to Duro, the owner was unwilling to accept proposals that would have allowed Maricarmen to remain or delayed the eviction.

She also said the legal team had sought somewhere to take Maricarmen’s personal belongings after the eviction.

The eviction nevertheless proceeded on Wednesday morning. 

Later reports said Maricarmen was taken to Hospital Gregorio Marañón after leaving the building on a stretcher. Her immediate housing arrangements subsequently became a separate concern. 

Case Fuels Wider Housing Debate

The incident has become a prominent example in Spain’s continuing debate over housing affordability, rental security and evictions.

Housing campaigners have used the case to demand stronger protections for vulnerable tenants, while the legal proceedings demonstrate that the eviction followed a court process over the validity of the tenancy.

RTVE reported that the tenants’ union subsequently called demonstrations in 12 Spanish cities following the eviction. The campaigners used the protests to demand action on measures intended to protect tenants from eviction. 

The case also highlights the difficult circumstances faced by older tenants whose housing arrangements were established under older rental agreements.

For Maricarmen, the dispute ended with her removal from the apartment where she had spent most of her life.

The protesters were unable to prevent the judicial order from being executed, despite the overnight mobilisation and the confrontation with police.

The eviction has since become a wider symbol in Spain’s housing debate, particularly among tenant organisations campaigning for greater protection for vulnerable renters.

The post Riot Police Clash With Protesters As 87-Year-Old Woman Is Evicted In Madrid appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

The Lagos State Environmental Protection Agency (LASEPA) has sealed 12 establishments across parts of Lagos State over what it described as persistent violations of environmental regulations.

The enforcement operation was carried out on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, across Ogba, Idimu-Ikota, Ejigbo, LASU-Iba Road, Igando and Agodo-Egbe.

LASEPA announced the action on Wednesday, saying the affected establishments had received repeated warnings, abatement notices and opportunities to comply with the agency’s directives before the enforcement exercise.

The agency said the operation was carried out in line with Lagos State Government directives to strengthen compliance with environmental laws, safeguard public health and promote a cleaner and safer environment.

The enforcement affected a range of establishments, including hotels, lounges, a nightclub, a furniture business, a plastics company, a vegetable oil business and a church. 

LASEPA Cites Noise Pollution And Non-Compliance

According to LASEPA, the violations varied from one establishment to another.

Thrillz Lounge on Odusanmi Street in Ogba was sealed over noise pollution and non-compliance with the agency’s directives.

Feixiang Plastic, located along LASU-Ojo Road at Oko Filling Bus Stop, was also sealed for non-compliance.

Marvel Hotel & Suites on Chrisbee Crescent, BRT Bus Stop, Igando, was sealed over noise pollution and non-compliance.

Keviz Hotel & Suites on Councilor Ajayi Street, Obadore Bus Stop, along LASU-Iba Road, was sealed for obstruction of duty and non-compliance.

DSN Hotel & Suites on Benson Onyeacholen Street, O’Mark Bus Stop, along LASU-Igando Road, was also sealed for non-compliance.

Rudaj Vegetable Oil, located on Tanimowo Street, Ologufe Bus Stop, Igando Road, was similarly sealed for non-compliance with LASEPA’s directives. 

Church Among Establishments Sealed

A Celestial Church of Christ parish was also affected by the enforcement operation.

The Celestial Church of Christ, Aduragbemi Parish, located on Adetola Buhari Street, Okerube Bus Stop, Ikotun, was sealed over noise pollution and non-compliance with LASEPA directives.

The agency has repeatedly carried out environmental enforcement operations involving religious institutions in Lagos, particularly where it identifies noise pollution or other environmental concerns.

In the latest operation, however, LASEPA’s stated reason for sealing the parish was specifically noise pollution and non-compliance.

The action forms part of the agency’s broader enforcement mandate covering religious institutions, commercial operators and other facilities across the state.

LASEPA has urged religious institutions and other operators to comply with applicable environmental standards and obtain the required approvals. 

More Hotels, Businesses Shut

Limas, located on Aro-Oloye Street, off Abaranje Road in Abaranje, Ikotun, was sealed for non-compliance with the agency’s directives.

Nico Hotel & Suites, located at Ayawo Close, NEPA Bus Stop, along Egbe-Isolo Road in Ejigbo, was also sealed for non-compliance.

At Agodo-Egbe, 10Kobo Night Club on Abanishe Street, off Hostel Road, was sealed over noise pollution and non-compliance.

Master Furniture on Coleman Street, Pao Bus Stop, Idimu-Ikota Road, was sealed for non-compliance.

Nikky’s Executive Bar & Lounge on Governor’s Road, Ikotun, was the 12th establishment listed by LASEPA and was also sealed for non-compliance with the agency’s directives. 

The agency’s list shows that most of the closures were linked to failure to comply with directives, while specific establishments were additionally cited for noise pollution or obstruction of duty.

Agency Says Operators Had Prior Warnings

LASEPA said the enforcement action did not come without prior engagement with the affected establishments.

According to the agency, the premises had received warnings, abatement notices and opportunities to address the identified environmental concerns.

LASEPA said the establishments nevertheless failed to implement the prescribed corrective measures or comply with its directives.

The agency therefore proceeded with the enforcement operation as part of its responsibility to ensure that businesses and other facilities comply with environmental requirements.

The statement did not provide details of the dates of the individual warnings or the specific corrective measures demanded from each establishment.

It also did not state how long each establishment would remain sealed or the specific conditions required for reopening.

Those details may depend on subsequent compliance assessments by the agency.

LASEPA Warns Businesses And Religious Institutions

LASEPA General Manager, Dr Babatunde Ajayi, reaffirmed the agency’s commitment to protecting public health and preserving the environment.

Ajayi urged business owners, facility operators, religious institutions, scrap dealers and residents across Lagos to adopt environmentally responsible practices.

He also called on operators to obtain the necessary permits and approvals and comply with applicable environmental regulations.

The LASEPA boss further urged affected and other operators to cooperate with the agency as it carries out its regulatory responsibilities.

The agency said it would continue enforcement activities across Lagos against activities that violate environmental regulations or pose risks to public health and the wellbeing of residents. 

Enforcement Across Lagos

The latest operation is part of a continuing pattern of environmental enforcement by LASEPA across different parts of Lagos.

Recent enforcement operations have also involved religious institutions, hotels, businesses and other establishments accused by the agency of environmental violations.

The agency’s approach includes issuing warnings and abatement notices before sealing premises where it says operators fail to comply.

LASEPA’s latest statement indicates that the September 22 operation covered several areas rather than being concentrated in one local government or neighbourhood.

The spread of the affected establishments across Ogba, Ikotun, Igando, Ejigbo, Idimu-Ikota, Agodo-Egbe and surrounding areas reflects the agency’s statewide enforcement responsibilities.

Environmental compliance remains particularly relevant in densely populated parts of Lagos, where noise, waste, air pollution and other environmental concerns can affect surrounding communities.

However, the latest LASEPA statement specifically identifies the individual violations attributed to each establishment rather than providing a broader assessment of environmental conditions in the affected areas.

Full List Of The 12 Sealed Establishments

The establishments listed by LASEPA are:

1. Thrillz Lounge — Ogba — noise pollution and non-compliance.
2. Feixiang Plastic — LASU-Ojo Road — non-compliance.
3. Marvel Hotel & Suites — Igando — noise pollution and non-compliance.
4. Keviz Hotel & Suites — LASU-Iba Road — obstruction of duty and non-compliance.
5. DSN Hotel & Suites — LASU-Igando Road — non-compliance.
6. Rudaj Vegetable Oil — Igando Road — non-compliance.
7. Celestial Church of Christ, Aduragbemi Parish — Ikotun — noise pollution and non-compliance.
8. Limas — Abaranje, Ikotun — non-compliance.
9. Nico Hotel & Suites — Ejigbo — non-compliance.
10. 10Kobo Night Club — Agodo-Egbe — noise pollution and non-compliance.
11. Master Furniture — Idimu-Ikota Road — non-compliance.
12. Nikky’s Executive Bar & Lounge — Ikotun — non-compliance. 

LASEPA’s action underscores the agency’s position that businesses, religious institutions and other operators must comply with environmental regulations even after receiving warnings and opportunities to correct identified breaches.

For the affected establishments, reopening will depend on their compliance with the agency’s requirements and any subsequent regulatory steps.

The agency has also urged operators across Lagos to take environmental compliance seriously rather than waiting for enforcement action.

As of September 23, LASEPA had not announced in the reports reviewed how quickly the 12 establishments could reopen or whether any had already begun the process of addressing the identified violations.

The post LASEPA Seals 12 Lagos Establishments Over Environmental Violations appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

Anambra Flood: Pupil Missing as Police Rescue Seven Schoolchildren, Two Adults

The Anambra State Police Command has confirmed that a pupil is missing following heavy rainfall and flooding that submerged the Nibo-Isiagu Road in Awka, the state capital.

The incident occurred in the early hours of Tuesday, September 22, 2026, when schoolchildren and adults travelling along the affected route were caught in the flood.

The Police Public Relations Officer in Anambra State, SP Tochukwu Ikenga, disclosed the incident in a statement made available to journalists in Awka.

Ikenga said the identity of the missing pupil had not yet been established, while the police command had intensified efforts to locate the child.

According to him, nine people were rescued from the affected area, comprising seven schoolchildren and two adults.

He said the rescue was carried out by the police’s Safe School Operatives with the support of members of the local community and other good-spirited Nigerians.

“The incident occurred in the early hours of today, when some schoolchildren and adults were caught up in the flood while travelling along the affected area,” Ikenga said.

He explained that the Safe School Operatives quickly mobilised after receiving information about the incident and worked alongside community members to rescue the seven schoolchildren and two adults.

The rescued persons were subsequently moved to safety.

Ikenga said search and rescue operations were still ongoing in the affected area as the police and other stakeholders continued efforts to locate the missing pupil and account for everyone who may have been affected.

He added that the operation was being conducted in collaboration with members of the community and relevant stakeholders.

The Commissioner of Police in Anambra State, Nnanna Ama, directed that the search and rescue operation be sustained and expanded until the missing person is located.

Ama also appealed to residents around the affected route to provide any useful information that could assist the police in locating the missing pupil.

The police command urged residents to exercise extreme caution when approaching flooded roads, bridges and waterways, particularly during periods of heavy rainfall.

Ikenga specifically advised parents and guardians to ensure that children do not attempt to cross flooded or otherwise dangerous routes.

He also urged motorists, school authorities and other road users to exercise caution when travelling through areas affected by flooding.

The police said it remained committed to protecting schoolchildren and other residents of Anambra State during emergencies.

Ikenga added that the command would continue strengthening its collaboration with communities and relevant agencies under the Safe School Initiative to help prevent avoidable loss of lives during emergencies.

The incident highlights the risks faced by schoolchildren and other road users when heavy rainfall causes flooding on major routes, particularly in areas where floodwaters can quickly make roads unsafe.

The police search for the missing pupil was continuing as of Tuesday, with authorities calling on members of the public to provide information that could assist the rescue effort.

(NAN)

The post Anambra Flood: Pupil Missing as Police Rescue Seven Schoolchildren, Two Adults appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

Why Brazil Opens the UN General Assembly Before Other Countries

Every year, world leaders and government representatives gather in New York for the United Nations General Assembly to discuss major international issues.

The high-level General Debate for the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly began on Tuesday, September 22, 2026.

One of the longstanding features of the event is Brazil’s position as the first country to address the General Debate.

Here are five things to know about the tradition.

1. Why does Brazil speak first?

Brazil has delivered the opening speech at the UN General Debate since 1947, making it a longstanding diplomatic tradition.

According to the United Nations, during the early years of the organisation, countries were reluctant to be the first to address the General Assembly. Brazil repeatedly volunteered to take the opening position, and the practice eventually became an established tradition.

The United States, as the host country of the United Nations headquarters in New York, traditionally speaks immediately after Brazil.

2. Is Brazil required to speak first?

No.

There is no formal United Nations rule requiring Brazil to open the General Debate.

Instead, the position developed through diplomatic practice and has continued over the decades. What began as Brazil volunteering to speak first eventually became an established feature of the annual UN General Assembly proceedings.

3. How is the speaking order determined for other countries?

After Brazil and the United States deliver their addresses, the speaking order is determined through a combination of factors.

Heads of state generally take precedence, followed by heads of government and other government representatives, including foreign ministers.

The United Nations also considers geographical balance, the order in which requests to speak were submitted and other relevant factors when determining the sequence of speakers.

4. How long can leaders speak?

Speakers are requested to limit their General Debate statements to 15 minutes.

However, in practice, government officials can speak for longer than the recommended time.

The General Debate provides countries with an opportunity to present their positions on international matters and highlight issues considered important to their governments.

5. Why does Brazil’s opening speech attract attention?

Brazil’s position at the beginning of the General Debate means its address comes before those of the other countries participating in the main high-level discussions.

With representatives from all 193 UN member states taking part, the General Debate is one of the world’s largest annual diplomatic gatherings.

The opening position therefore gives Brazil an early opportunity to present its priorities and address the international community at the start of the debate.

The post UN General Assembly: 5 Facts Behind Brazil’s Opening Address appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

Residents of Ilupeju Estate, Ijebu-Ode, fear possible demolition as rival ownership claims over the community’s land remain before the courts.

A 90-year-old retiree, Mrs. Elizabeth Ogunbate, has appealed to authorities and parties involved in a longstanding land dispute at Ilupeju Estate, Odo-Oyanta, Ijebu-Ode, Ogun State, to pursue an amicable settlement and prevent possible demolition of homes in the community.

Ogunbate’s appeal comes amid growing concerns among residents over the ownership of the land on which more than 100 people have reportedly built homes and lived for many years.

Residents staged a protest on Saturday, expressing concern over what they described as an escalating threat to their homes and security.

The dispute centres on competing claims over portions of land at the estate, with residents insisting that they acquired their plots in good faith from individuals they believed had the legal authority to sell or allocate the properties. 

90-Year-Old Retiree Fears Losing Home Again

Ogunbate is among the residents affected by the dispute.

According to residents, she previously experienced demolition and later returned from Lagos to settle in Ijebu-Ode following her retirement.

At 90, she is now appealing for authorities and the parties involved to prevent any action that could leave her without a home again.

Her appeal has become one of the human dimensions of the wider dispute, which involves questions over ownership, land transactions and the legal status of properties occupied by residents.

The residents say they have lived on the disputed land for more than two decades after purchasing plots and developing them into homes.

They are asking authorities to examine the competing claims before any action is taken against occupants.

Residents Demand Verification of Land Documents

The residents maintain that they did not knowingly acquire disputed properties.

They said they purchased their plots from people they believed had the authority to sell or allocate the land and subsequently invested in building homes on the properties.

Their position is that the long period of occupation and development of the area should be considered alongside the competing ownership claims.

They are now calling for relevant authorities to examine the title documents presented by the different parties and establish the history of the transactions involving the land.

The residents also want clarification on the scope and implications of previous court proceedings and judgments referenced in the dispute.

These include earlier cases identified as HCJ/72/2009 and CA/IB/M.219/2013. 

Legal Dispute Moves Through Courts

The disagreement has already entered the legal process, with correspondence between lawyers indicating that competing claims over the land are being contested.

A May 6 letter from Valiant & Valor, acting on behalf of administrators and beneficiaries of the estate of the late Mrs. Olayide Odutola, asserted ownership of several parcels within the area.

The lawyers reportedly demanded that occupants vacate the affected properties.

The demand has, however, been disputed by lawyers representing some of the residents.

According to the residents’ legal representatives, there are ongoing court proceedings concerning the disputed properties.

One of the cases cited is Suit No. HCS/29/2024, Mrs. Yewande Ogunde and others versus Mr. Ibrahim Akeem, before the High Court in Ijebu-Ode.

A separate criminal matter, identified as MIJ/63/26, is also reportedly before the Chief Magistrate Court in Ijebu-Ode.

The existence of the cases underscores the need for the competing claims and the status of the affected properties to be determined through the appropriate legal process. 

Residents Seek Clarity Before Any Demolition

The residents are particularly concerned about the possibility of demolition while questions surrounding ownership remain unresolved.

They are therefore asking relevant authorities to establish the validity of the different title documents and trace the history of transactions involving the disputed parcels.

They also want authorities to determine how previous judgments relate to the current claims and whether the properties occupied by residents fall within land covered by earlier court decisions.

The residents’ request is centred on verification and clarification rather than simply rejecting the claims of the opposing parties.

Their position is that a clear examination of the documents, transactions and court records could help establish the legal status of the properties and reduce the risk of further confrontation.

Long-Term Occupation Adds to Residents’ Concerns

The reported length of occupation is another major concern for residents.

More than 100 occupants are said to have lived in the estate for many years, with some having spent decades developing their properties.

For homeowners such as Ogunbate, the dispute is therefore not merely about undeveloped land.

Many residents have established homes and communities on the disputed parcels, meaning any demolition could have significant consequences for people who have invested in the properties over an extended period.

The residents are consequently calling for caution and a resolution that takes into account the competing claims as well as the circumstances under which they acquired and developed their properties.

Appeal for Amicable Resolution

Ogunbate’s appeal reflects the wider call by residents for the dispute to be resolved without actions that could result in displacement.

The 90-year-old retiree is asking the authorities and parties involved to explore an amicable solution while the legal issues are being addressed.

Residents are also urging the relevant institutions to review the documentation presented by the competing sides and clarify the legal status of the affected land.

The matter remains subject to the ongoing legal proceedings cited by the parties, and the competing ownership claims have not been independently determined in the available report.

The latest development therefore leaves the residents awaiting clarity on the title documents, existing court cases and the potential implications for their homes.

For now, their principal demand is for the relevant authorities to investigate the competing claims thoroughly and for the parties involved to pursue a peaceful resolution that can prevent further uncertainty in Ilupeju Estate.

The residents’ concerns highlight the wider complications that can arise when land transactions, competing title claims and long-term occupation intersect.

Until the legal and documentary questions are conclusively addressed, the affected residents remain concerned about the future of their homes and the possibility of further action against properties within the estate. 

The post 90-Year-Old Retiree Appeals for Peaceful Settlement Over Ogun Land Dispute appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

An Abia State Chief Magistrate’s Court sitting in Umuahia has ordered parties involved in a dispute over approximately 100 hectares of ancestral land in Isuikwuato to maintain peace.

Chief Magistrate Ngozi Lekwa issued the order during the hearing of a criminal case involving three members of Asunkpa Umuokombo Acha Autonomous Community.

The case, Commissioner of Police v. Royal Nwankwo, Chimezie Elekwe Martins and Kelechi Azubuike Onuoha, is registered as Charge No. MIS/33C/2024.

The defendants, aged 49, 45 and 40, face a six-count charge involving alleged conspiracy, threats of violence, trespass, intimidation and conduct likely to cause a breach of peace.

They pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Dispute Over Ancestral Land

The case followed a petition submitted by a community elder, Anthony Imo Nwankwo, to the Abia State Commissioner of Police.

The dispute concerns competing claims over the ownership and proposed sharing of about 100 hectares of ancestral land. The parties reportedly claim ownership through their family lineages.

According to the charge sheet, the alleged offences occurred in September 2022 at Asunkpa Umuokombo Acha Autonomous Community.

Court Sets October 22 for Further Hearing

At the previous hearing, Nwankwo testified as the first prosecution witness.

The second prosecution witness is expected to testify when the case resumes on October 22, 2026.

Following submissions by prosecution and defence counsel, Goodwill Nwokeiwu, the Chief Magistrate directed all parties to avoid actions capable of escalating the dispute.

The order is intended to preserve peace while the court continues hearing the case.

The court has not determined the defendants’ guilt, and they remain presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

The post Abia Court Orders Parties to Maintain Peace Over Land Dispute appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

The plaintiffs argue that the signage charge violates electoral laws and could restrict political participation ahead of the 2027 elections.

Oyo State Governor and Allied Peoples Movement (APM) presidential candidate, Seyi Makinde, and the party have sued Abia State Governor Alex Otti over an alleged ₦200 million campaign billboard fee.

The suit, marked HU/214/2026, was filed before the Abia State High Court, Umuahia Judicial Division, on September 17, 2026.

The plaintiffs also joined the Abia State Attorney-General, the Abia State Signage and Advertisement Agency (ABSAA) and the State House of Assembly as defendants.

Plaintiffs Challenge Campaign Fee

Makinde and the APM argued that the fee imposed on presidential candidates seeking to display campaign materials in Abia violates the Constitution, the Electoral Act 2026 and other relevant laws.

They are asking the court to set aside ABSAA regulations imposing the ₦200 million fee or any similar charge on presidential candidates.

The plaintiffs also want a perpetual injunction preventing the defendants and their agents from removing, defacing, destroying or obstructing their campaign billboards and outdoor advertisements.

APM Cites Electoral Act Provisions

The plaintiffs argued that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has exclusive authority to establish rules governing political campaigns.

They cited provisions of the 1999 Constitution and Section 99(1) of the Electoral Act 2026 in support of their position.

They further relied on Section 99(2), which prohibits the use of state apparatus or regulatory bodies to favour or disadvantage a political party or candidate.

Makinde and the APM alleged that the fee could create financial barriers for opposition candidates and affect equal participation in the electoral process.

These claims remain arguments presented by the plaintiffs and have not been judicially determined.

Plaintiffs Reference ₦10bn Campaign Spending Limit

The suit also refers to Section 92 of the Electoral Act, which sets the total campaign expenditure limit for a presidential election at ₦10 billion nationwide.

The plaintiffs argued that if similar billboard charges were introduced across states, campaign advertising expenses could consume a substantial portion of the permitted spending limit.

They maintained that state powers over outdoor signage must not override valid federal electoral legislation.

Court Asked to Protect Campaign Rights

The supporting affidavit was reportedly deposed to by Aisha Abdullahi Abubakar, identified as the APM’s National Welfare Officer.

She stated that the plaintiffs became aware of the fee while preparing for a nationwide campaign tour covering the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory.

The plaintiffs argued that unless the court intervenes, the fee could undermine their constitutional right to seek public office and the principle of a level playing field.

The court’s decision on the claims was not included in the supplied report.

The post Makinde, APM Sue Abia Governor Otti Over N200m Campaign Billboard Fee appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

Housing Minister Muttaqha Rabe Darma says serving and retired military personnel will benefit from the National Social Housing Programme.

The Minister of Housing and Urban Development, Muttaqha Rabe Darma, has pledged Federal Government support for the Nigerian Army Post-Service Housing Development Programme.

Darma made the commitment when the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerian Army Post-Service Housing Development Limited (PHDL), Major General K.O. Ukandu, paid him a courtesy visit in Abuja.

The minister reaffirmed the government’s commitment to providing decent and affordable housing for military personnel, police officers and other security services. 

FG Plans 774,000 Housing Units

Darma disclosed that the Federal Government plans to construct approximately 774,000 housing units nationwide under the National Social Housing Programme.

He said the initiative would target low- and medium-income earners, including serving and retired military personnel who lack personal accommodation and wish to return to their home communities after service.

“Our plan is to build over 774,000 houses all over Nigeria under what we call the Social Housing Programme. Members of the military, both serving and retired, can favourably benefit from this scheme,” Darma said.

The minister added that the government’s housing policies would consider the sacrifices of military personnel, police officers, other security workers and civil servants.

1,550 Military Housing Units Planned

Darma also said the Federal Government plans to deliver 1,550 housing units under the Renewed Hope Military Housing Project at Brains and Hammers before the end of 2026.

He said the project forms part of broader efforts to improve housing access for those serving the country.

Army Promotes Soldier First Initiative

Speaking earlier, Major General Ukandu said the visit aligned with the Nigerian Army’s “Soldier First” concept, which prioritises the welfare of military personnel.

He explained that the Affordable Home Ownership Option for All Soldiers (AHOOAS) allows soldiers to contribute 10 per cent of the housing cost, while the Army covers the balance.

Ukandu said PHDL acquires land from state governments and other sources at affordable rates, enabling officers and soldiers to develop retirement homes through long-term mortgage arrangements.

He also requested the ministry’s continued support for the Renewed Hope Military Housing Project.

Ministry Reaffirms Collaboration

The ministry’s Director of Public Building and Housing Development, Pemi Temitope, acknowledged the existing collaboration between the ministry and the military.

He said the ministry would continue working with relevant institutions to promote quality, safe and affordable housing for Nigerians.

The post FG Targets 774,000 Homes as Minister Backs Army Post-Service Housing appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

The agency urges governments and residents in vulnerable communities to take precautionary measures and prepare for possible evacuation.

The Nigeria Hydrological Services Agency (NiHSA) has issued a high flood risk alert covering 15 states from September 19 to 25, 2026.

The warning, designated NFA-2026-262, is based on forecasts of rising river levels and an increased risk of riverine flooding across the affected areas.  

The affected states are Imo, Cross River, Ebonyi, Benue, Anambra, Akwa Ibom, Lagos, Rivers, Edo, Kogi, Taraba, Delta, Bayelsa, Enugu and Abia.

NiHSA Director-General and Chief Executive Officer, Umar Mohammed, disclosed the alert in a statement on Saturday. He said nine river stations required close monitoring.

The agency identified Obubra, Itigidi and Epento along the Cross River among the locations requiring attention.

Communities and Infrastructure at Risk

According to the assessment, significant populations and critical infrastructure face exposure to flooding across the affected states.

In Cross River State alone, NiHSA identified 2,471 communities, 703 schools, 344 health facilities, 145 markets, 453 religious centres and 854 hectares of farmland within exposed areas.

Mohammed urged state governments, local councils, emergency management authorities, traditional rulers and community leaders to implement immediate preventive measures.

He also advised residents in flood-prone communities to relocate people, livestock and valuable belongings to safer and higher ground where necessary.

NiHSA Issues Safety Advice

The agency urged communities to activate local early-warning and emergency response mechanisms while monitoring official flood advisories and river-level updates.

Mohammed warned residents against crossing flooded roads, bridges and fast-moving water, either on foot or in vehicles.

He also advised authorities and communities to prepare relief materials, safe drinking water, water-treatment supplies and first-aid materials.

The agency called for the identification and preparation of safe shelters for possible temporary evacuation.

Residents were further advised to clear blocked drainage channels and river outlets only where it is safe to do so. NiHSA also cautioned against construction or habitation in vulnerable floodplain areas.

Mohammed said early action and compliance with official flood warnings remained essential to reducing potential losses of lives, property and livelihoods.

NiHSA said it would continue monitoring hydrological conditions and river levels before issuing further updates.

The post NiHSA Warns 15 States of High Flood Risk From September 19 to 25 appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

Developers and property experts call for cheaper land, stronger housing supply, affordable mortgages and improved regulation.

Nigeria’s housing affordability crisis is deepening as rising property prices, escalating rents and increasing construction costs place homeownership beyond the reach of millions of households.

Real estate developers, estate surveyors and investment professionals attributed the challenge to expensive land, costly building materials, infrastructure gaps, high financing costs, statutory charges and weak household purchasing power.

The stakeholders made the observations while highlighting the need for reforms across Nigeria’s housing value chain.

Rising Construction Costs Drive Property Prices

President of the Real Estate Developers Association of Nigeria (REDAN), Oba Akintoye Adeoye, said rising residential property prices and rents had become a major concern for developers, tenants, prospective homeowners and investors.

Adeoye explained that housing costs were increasing faster than the purchasing power of many Nigerians.

He said policymakers must examine land acquisition, construction, infrastructure, finance, transportation, professional services and regulatory charges instead of focusing only on the final price of properties.

“When the cost of producing a house increases, it inevitably impacts the price of the finished property,” REDAN said.

However, the association cautioned developers against using rising production costs to justify arbitrary pricing or consumer exploitation.

It called for measures to reduce the cost of land, infrastructure, building materials and housing finance, arguing that lower production costs would enable developers to offer more affordable homes.

Experts Demand Affordable Mortgage Financing

Adeoye urged greater access to long-term mortgage financing, allowing Nigerians to spread homeownership payments over 15, 20 or 30 years.

REDAN also advocated rent-to-own arrangements, cooperative housing schemes and housing savings programmes.

The Ministry of Finance Incorporated Real Estate Investment Fund (MREIF) reported in June 2026 that it had delivered ₦128 billion in mortgages to 1,859 families across 25 states.

The mortgages reportedly carried a fixed interest rate of 9.75 per cent, with repayment periods of up to 20 years and a minimum 10 per cent equity contribution.

By August, the State House said MREIF’s disbursements had increased to ₦140 billion, supporting 2,018 mortgages across 27 states. 

Despite these interventions, experts maintained that affordable mortgages alone would not resolve the crisis if housing production remained expensive.

Land Scarcity and Urban Migration

Chief M.I. Okoro, a Fellow of the Nigerian Institution of Estate Surveyors and Valuers (NIESV), identified population growth, urban migration and limited land supply as key drivers of rising property prices.

He pointed to Lagos areas such as Ikoyi, Victoria Island and Lekki Phase One, where developers increasingly construct vertically because of land scarcity and high acquisition costs.

Okoro said rising property values in prime locations were pushing residents towards less expensive communities on the Mainland and outskirts of Lagos.

He called for increased housing supply, social housing programmes and greater involvement by local governments.

“Social housing is not meant to be for profit motive. That is where government comes in,” he said.

Construction Inflation Worsens Affordability

Ayo Ibaru, Chief Investment Officer at housing development company Panterra, described the crisis as the result of interconnected pressures across the housing sector.

He identified rising costs of cement, steel, finishing materials, labour, diesel and imported equipment as major contributors.

According to Ibaru, exchange-rate volatility has also increased the cost of imported materials and technical expertise.

Developers consequently reassess project budgets and may transfer some additional costs to buyers and tenants through higher sale prices, rents and service charges.

However, he noted that developers’ ability to increase prices remains limited by household incomes and effective market demand.

He argued that housing must be affordable to build, finance and maintain.

Land Documentation and Market Transparency

Ibaru also identified inefficient land administration and limited market transparency as factors increasing housing costs.

He called for faster land registration, clearer disclosure requirements for off-plan developments, stronger developer accreditation and appropriate escrow arrangements.

He also advocated better mechanisms for addressing abandoned or poorly constructed projects.

REDAN urged consumers to verify developers and property titles and conduct due diligence before making substantial payments.

Experts Call for Balanced Housing Development

Okoro argued that improving infrastructure and economic opportunities outside major urban centres could reduce migration pressure on cities such as Lagos.

He identified electricity, water, roads and telecommunications as essential investments for smaller cities and rural communities.

The stakeholders agreed that Nigeria’s housing crisis involves multiple factors, including:

• Expensive land and construction materials.
• High financing costs.
• Inadequate infrastructure.
• Weak household purchasing power.
• Limited housing supply.
• Inefficient land administration.
• Gaps in regulation and consumer protection.

The experts said addressing these interconnected challenges would require coordinated action from government, developers, financial institutions, local authorities and other stakeholders.

The post Nigeria’s Housing Crisis Deepens as Rising Costs Push Homeownership Beyond Reach appeared first on Housing TV Africa.