PropTech in Nigeria: How Technology Is Changing Real Estate Investment

Nigeria’s real estate sector continues to attract interest, but rising property prices, increasing construction costs and the substantial capital required to purchase property have made direct ownership difficult for many people.

Property technology, commonly known as PropTech, is creating alternative ways to participate in the market. One example is fractional real estate investment, which allows multiple investors to contribute towards a property rather than having to purchase the entire asset individually.

Although this model can lower the financial barrier to entry, it also raises important legal questions. When does a property investment arrangement become a regulated financial product, and what responsibilities do the businesses operating these platforms have?

These questions are particularly important under Nigeria’s Investments and Securities Act, 2025 (ISA), which provides a framework for regulating investment activities and protecting investors.

What Is PropTech?

PropTech refers to the use of technology to improve how real estate is developed, marketed, financed, bought, sold, leased and managed.

It includes digital property marketplaces, online transaction platforms, property management software and technology-enabled investment services.

Fractional real estate investment is one of the models supported by these developments. It allows several people to participate financially in a single property or real estate project, with each investor holding an interest according to the legal structure of the arrangement.

Pooling resources to acquire property is not a new idea. Individuals have long combined their funds to purchase and manage real estate. Technology has changed how these arrangements can be organised, promoted and administered.

Previously, coordinating several property investors could involve extensive paperwork, significant administrative costs and difficulties monitoring contributions and investment performance.

Digital platforms can simplify these processes, improve record-keeping and make investment opportunities easier to distribute to potential participants.

However, fractional real estate arrangements do not all have the same legal structure. Depending on the arrangement, investors may own direct interests in a property, hold shares in a company established to acquire the asset, or participate through a trust or another recognised investment vehicle.

The distinction is important because the legal rights of investors and the regulatory obligations of the platform may differ according to the structure used.

Understanding the Regulatory Requirements

Making property investment more accessible does not remove the legal obligations associated with raising and managing money from investors.

Depending on how an arrangement is structured, several laws may apply, including the Investments and Securities Act, 2025, the Land Use Act, 1978, the Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020, the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023, and the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

These laws address different aspects of property ownership, corporate operations, investment regulation, personal data protection and financial crime prevention.

Consequently, PropTech operators must look beyond the technology used to offer their services. They also need to consider the legal nature of the investments they promote, the rights granted to participants and the obligations arising from their business models.

Investors, in turn, need to understand what they are purchasing and whether the relevant platform and investment arrangement meet applicable legal requirements.

SEC Oversight and the Investments and Securities Act

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulates Nigeria’s capital market and has responsibilities relating to investor protection and the maintenance of fair, efficient and transparent markets.

Under the ISA, the regulatory treatment of a PropTech investment depends significantly on the arrangement’s actual structure and activities.

For example, a platform that collects money from members of the public to invest in property and promises returns may raise different regulatory considerations from a straightforward arrangement in which two people jointly purchase a plot of land.

The label attached to an investment product does not, by itself, determine its legal status. The underlying rights, financial arrangements and manner in which funds are collected and managed are important factors.

For businesses developing digital property investment products, assessing these questions early can help identify the registrations, disclosures and other compliance measures that may be required.

When Does Fractional Property Investment Become a Collective Investment Scheme?

A collective investment scheme (CIS) is one of the regulatory categories relevant to fractional real estate.

The ISA addresses arrangements in which investors contribute money or other assets to participate in a portfolio, with those contributions pooled and managed collectively.

Where an arrangement meets the statutory definition of a CIS, it falls within the SEC’s regulatory framework.

However, not every fractional ownership arrangement automatically qualifies as a collective investment scheme.

For example, two individuals who directly purchase a plot of land together may simply be co-owners. If they each acquire a direct interest in the property and the arrangement does not involve the relevant features of a regulated collective investment scheme, the legal treatment may differ from a platform that pools public funds and professionally manages a portfolio of properties.

The distinction depends on the facts and legal structure of each arrangement. Businesses should not assume that every co-ownership model is regulated in the same way, nor should they assume that calling an investment fractional ownership exempts it from regulation.

Raising Money Through Shares and Other Securities

The ISA also provides frameworks for raising investment capital through securities connected to real estate and property development.

Depending on the structure, a company may issue shares or other permitted investment instruments that provide investors with financial rights associated with a property project or business.

Real estate investment trusts and other recognised structures can also enable multiple investors to participate in property-related investments and potentially benefit from rental income or changes in asset value.

These arrangements are legally distinct from one another. Buying shares in a company that owns property does not necessarily give a shareholder direct ownership of a specific property. The investor’s rights depend on the company’s structure, the relevant agreements and the securities acquired.

Where an investment product falls within the ISA’s provisions, the applicable registration, authorisation, disclosure and other regulatory requirements must be considered.

The law’s provisions concerning securities and property-related fundraising are therefore important for companies seeking to attract capital through digital platforms.

When Does an Investment Offer Become Public?

Another important consideration is whether a fundraising activity constitutes an invitation to the public.

The ISA establishes rules governing public offers of securities and the requirements that may apply, including prospectus-related obligations.

Offers distributed through mass media, websites or electronic channels may fall within the relevant provisions. The law also addresses offers circulated to particular groups and the distribution of application forms in connection with securities.

However, the statutory framework includes provisions concerning private arrangements that are not intended to make an investment available beyond the group originally approached.

The exact treatment depends on the circumstances and the applicable statutory conditions. Simply limiting access to a website or circulating an offer to a selected group does not necessarily establish that an arrangement is exempt.

PropTech operators planning to advertise investment opportunities online should therefore assess the legal implications of their marketing methods before inviting people to contribute money.

What PropTech Businesses Need to Consider

For developers, founders and operators of digital real estate platforms, regulatory compliance should be considered when designing an investment product, rather than postponed until after money has been raised.

Businesses should understand the legal structure of the product, the rights investors receive, how funds will be held and managed, and whether the activity requires regulatory registration or approval.

They should also establish appropriate documentation, disclosures and procedures for communicating investment risks.

These steps can help reduce the risk of disputes and regulatory problems as the business grows.

The specific requirements will depend on the business model and the laws applicable to its activities. Professional legal advice is therefore important before launching or expanding an investment platform.

What Investors Should Check Before Committing Funds

Digital platforms can make property opportunities easier to discover, but convenience should not replace due diligence.

Before investing, prospective participants should establish who legally owns the underlying property, what rights the investment provides and how the arrangement is structured.

They should also understand how returns are expected to be generated, what fees may apply, how and when funds can be withdrawn or an investment sold, and what risks could lead to losses.

Investors should verify relevant property documentation and investigate whether the platform and investment product comply with applicable regulatory requirements.

They should not assume that an advertised return is guaranteed or that a digital platform’s presence online establishes the legitimacy of its offering.

Careful examination of the investment documents, ownership arrangements and applicable regulatory status can help investors make better-informed decisions.

Conclusion

Fractional real estate investment has existed in different forms for generations. PropTech has changed how these arrangements can be organised, managed and offered to potential investors, creating opportunities for wider participation in the property market.

However, technology does not remove the legal principles governing property ownership, fundraising and investment regulation.

The legal and regulatory treatment of an investment depends on its substance, rather than the terminology used to describe it. An arrangement promoted as fractional property ownership may still fall within securities regulation if its actual features meet the relevant statutory requirements.

For PropTech businesses, sustainable growth requires more than developing an accessible digital platform. It also requires an appropriate legal structure, clear investor rights and compliance with applicable regulations from the outset.

For prospective investors, understanding the ownership model, expected returns, risks and regulatory position is essential before committing capital.

As Nigeria’s real estate sector becomes more technology-driven, sound due diligence and effective compliance will remain important to building trust and supporting responsible investment.

Disclaimer

This article is intended for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or other professional advice. The regulatory treatment of a particular investment depends on its specific circumstances and applicable law. Investors and businesses should seek qualified professional advice before making investment or compliance decisions.

Source: Nigeria Housing Market, PropTech in Nigeria: An Investor’s Introductory Guide.

The post PropTech in Nigeria: Opportunities and Investor Regulations appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

The Lagos State High Court sitting in Ikeja has granted a foreclosure order in favour of Citygate Global Investment Limited, authorising the financial services firm to take possession of and sell a mortgaged property belonging to businessman, Hyginus Eze, over an alleged unpaid loan facility of ₦150 million.

Justice Mathias O. Dawodu delivered the judgment in Suit No. ID/9743GCM/2025, ruling that Citygate Global Investment Limited had successfully established its legal right to enforce a mortgage agreement executed by the defendant in December 2024.

The court held that the company was entitled to exercise its powers under a Deed of Legal Mortgage and Memorandum of Deposit after Eze allegedly defaulted on repayment obligations tied to the facility.

According to court documents, the businessman obtained a ₦150 million loan facility from Citygate in December 2024 for a tenure of 10 months at an interest rate of four per cent.

The loan was secured with a property located at No. 4 Chidi Duru Street, formerly Eboma Street, off Havana Street, Ago Palace Way, Okota, Lagos State.

Citygate told the court that the defendant was expected to repay a total sum of ₦210 million between January and October 2025 but failed to meet the agreed repayment schedule, leaving a substantial outstanding balance.

In his defence, Eze argued that he received ₦135 million rather than ₦150 million and claimed to have repaid more than ₦90 million. He also maintained that he had sought reconciliation and restructuring of the loan facility.

However, Justice Dawodu ruled that the defendant failed to provide documentary evidence to support his claims of substantial repayment.

The court held that the burden of proof rested on the borrower and that unsupported assertions contained in affidavits could not override documentary records presented by the claimant.

The judge further noted that some correspondence tendered before the court amounted to admissions of indebtedness by the defendant.

Relying on established legal principles governing mortgage transactions, the court affirmed that a mortgagee has the right to foreclose and sell a mortgaged property where a borrower defaults on repayment obligations.

Consequently, the court granted Citygate Global Investment Limited possession of the property and authorised the company to proceed with its sale.

The court, however, declined requests for a perpetual injunction against the defendant and security enforcement orders, directing both parties to bear their respective legal costs.

Following the judgment, counsel to Citygate Global Investment Limited, Adeniyi Joshua, announced that the property had effectively become the company’s asset by virtue of the court’s foreclosure order.

The post Court Grants Citygate Foreclosure Order Over ₦150m Loan Default appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

At a recent meeting with stakeholders, the Commissioner for Housing, Moruf Akinderu-Fatai, urged estate agents to act against fake practitioners. These individuals encourage landlords to charge unfair rents and fees not recognized by Lagos law.

The commissioner raised concerns about the increasing rent hikes and unauthorized charges. He said such actions break the state’s real estate rules and add pressure on residents. He called on licensed agents to help regulate the system and restore order in rent practices across Lagos.

Akinderu-Fatai stressed that rent should be paid monthly, quarterly, or yearly. Tenants should not be asked to pay more than one year upfront. This model, he said, would make housing more affordable and reduce rent default. The state is working with key players to roll out the system smoothly for both tenants and landlords.

At the meeting, he was joined by the Special Adviser to the Governor on Housing, Barakat Odunuga-Bakare. Together, they reminded agents of the real estate law. It allows for a maximum charge of 10 percent on property transactions. They also urged agents to promote the flexible rent model to their clients.

In response, ERCAN President Godwin Aleke assured the government of the group’s full support. He said members of the association are committed to fair rent and will help curb bad practices in the sector. He promised to work with other stakeholders to bring back trust in the real estate business.

The meeting is part of the government’s wider plan to engage with industry players. It wants to create a fair, affordable, and transparent rental system for everyone in Lagos.

The post Lagos Moves Against Illegal Rent Hikes and Fake Real Estate Agents appeared first on Housing TV Africa.

The Dubai Land Department (DLD) did not disclose the developers’ names but stated that they had violated the law on real estate development escrow accounts.

Escrow Accounts: Ensuring Investor Protection in Dubai Real Estate

A real estate escrow account is designated for a real estate project where funds collected from buyers of off-plan units are deposited. This account aims to regulate the construction process of the units sold, ensuring the protection of investor rights.

READ ALSO: Dubai’s Real Estate Vision 2040: A Growth Catalyst Highlighted at the International Property Show

Ali Abdullah Al Ali’s Warning to Investors

Ali Abdullah Al Ali, director of the Real Estate Control Department, urged investors to verify that off-plan projects are licensed and registered with an escrow account. They can check this through the DLD’s Dubai REST application. He also cautioned investors against making any payments outside the project’s escrow account.

The post Dubai Fines Developers Dh500,000 Each for Real Estate Law Violations appeared first on Housing TV Africa.